Lately, there have been many arguments about whether the iPhone 5 camera is actually better quality than a true point-and-shoot camera. If you already own an iPhone 5, buying a true camera could be considered a waste of money. That is, if the iPhone camera is truly of high quality. Has Apple improved the camera enough? Here's a visual test: iPhone 5 camera vs. the Nikon Coolpix S550, an example of a point-and-shoot.
Picture of a leaf. iPhone (left) vs. Nikon S550 (right). (Click to see larger) [caption id="attachment_358" align="aligncenter" width="1024"] Grass - iPhone 5 (left) vs. Nikon S550 (right). (Click to see larger)[/caption] [caption id="attachment_365" align="aligncenter" width="769"] Chair, taken in low light. iPhone (left) vs. Nikon S550 (right); No Flash (top) vs. Flash (bottom).[/caption]
In a mobile device, there's always cons over a dedicated camera. In the iPhone 5, they are as follows:
In some ways, the iPhone 5 camera is better quality than many point-and-shoot cameras.
Usually your experience can also be impacted by these technology advantages:
You should not replace your camera with an iPhone if you require zoom, you will take many dark shots, or if you will take many sports shots. SLR cameras are incomparable to the iPhone, so professionals shouldn't use the iPhone 5 camera. Other than those things, the iPhone 5 camera is perfect for the casual photographer, especially those that like to share photos online.
Welcome! I'm BradzTech, a Computer Science student at Rochester Institute of Technology. I am passionate about computers and analyzing the latest happenings in the rapidly developing modern field of technology, specifically, using it to help people. I share my thoughts on Twitter and, occasionally, here on my blog. Learn more about me.